PT Journal
AU Sadilek, M
   Kousal, L
   Naprstkova, N
   Szotkowski, T
   Hajnys, J
TI The Analysis of Accuracy of Machined Surfaces and Surfaces Roughness after 3axis and 5axis Milling
SO Manufacturing Technology Journal
PY 2018
BP 1015
EP 1022
VL 18
IS 6
DI 10.21062/ujep/217.2018/a/1213-2489/MT/18/6/1015
DE 5axis milling; 3axis milling; Surface Roughness; Machining Strategy. CAM
AB This article concentrates on the assessment of a 3D shape of parts of components. The 3D shape is divided into three distinctive shapes: a spherical canopy, a pyramid, and a concave transition between these shapes. Create these shape surfaces, various strategies of 3axis and 5axis milling are used. These strategies are described and then compared on a model in CAM MasterCAM software. The surface of the component is further measured with a roughness measuring device. The accuracy of the surface of the component is measured using a 3D measurement centre and then compared between surfaces with a different machining strategy. The last criterion for comparing machining strategies is to compare machining surfaces with a drawn tool over a pushed tool. Lastly, the best machining strategy is selected for the most suited surface of the component.
ER