Manufacturing Technology 2016, 16(2):425-431 | DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2016/a/1213-2489/MT/16/2/425

Tool Geometry Influence on Surface Integrity of Machined Austenite Stainless Steel

Zdeněk Pitrmuc1, Jiří Čapek2, Kamil Kolařík2, Libor Beránek1, Jan Urban1
1 Department of Machining, Process Planning and Metrology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague
2 Department of Solid State Engineering, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague

The goal of this contribution was to describe the microstructure and properties changes of difficult to cut materials after turning. Surface residual stresses, roughness, microstructure of AISI 304 type stainless steel were studied as a function of side rake angle o. Residual stresses and phase composition of surface and sub-surface layers were determined using X-ray diffraction techniques. The presence of strain-induced martensite was investigated using Barkhausen noise, optical microscope, and microhardness measurement.

Keywords: Austenite Stainless Steel, Strain-induced Martensite, Tool Geometry, Residual Stresses, Roughness

Published: April 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pitrmuc Z, Čapek J, Kolařík K, Beránek L, Urban J. Tool Geometry Influence on Surface Integrity of Machined Austenite Stainless Steel. Manufacturing Technology. 2016;16(2):425-431. doi: 10.21062/ujep/x.2016/a/1213-2489/MT/16/2/425.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open article abstract

    References

    1. MOVERARE, J. J., ODEN, M. (2002). Deformation behaviour of a prestrained duplex stainless steel. In: Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 337, No. 1, pp. 25 - 38. Go to original source...
    2. JANG, D. Y., WATKINS, T. R., KOZACZEK, K. J., HUBBARD, C. R., CAVIN, O. B. (1996). Surface residual stresses in machined austenitic stainless steel. In: Wear, Vol. 194, No. 1, pp. 168 - 173. Go to original source...
    3. M'SAOUBI, R., OUTEIRO, J. C., CHANGEUX, B., LEBRUN, J. L., DIAS, A. M. (1999). Residual stress analysis in orthogonal machining of standard and resulfurized AISI 316L steels. In: Journal of materials processing technology, Vol. 96, No. 1, pp. 225 - 233. Go to original source...
    4. MARTIN, M., WEBER, S., IZAWA, C., WAGNER, S., PUNDT, A., THEISEN, W. (2011). Influence of machining-induced martensite on hydrogen-assisted fracture of AISI type 304 austenitic stainless steel. In: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 36, No. 17, pp. 11195 - 11206. Go to original source...
    5. HAUSILD, P., KOLARIK, K., KARLIK, M. (2013). Characterization of strain-induced martensitic transformation in A301 stainless steel by Barkhausen noise measurement. In: Materials & Design, Vol. 44, pp. 548 - 554. Go to original source...
    6. CHEN, H. T., YAN, M. F., FU, S. S. (2014). Martensite transformation induced by plasma nitrocarburizing on AISI304 austenitic stainless steel. In: Vacuum, Vol. 105, pp. 33 - 38. Go to original source...
    7. LV, J., LUO, H. (2014). Effects of strain and strain-induced α'-martensite on passive films in AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. In: Materials Science and Engineering: C, Vol. 34, pp. 484 - 490. Go to original source...
    8. MOORE, M. G., EVANS, W. P. (1958). Mathematical correlation for stress in removed layers in X-ray diffraction residual stress analysis. In: SAE Technical Paper, Vol. 66, pp. 340. Go to original source...
    9. AZANZA RICARDO, C. L., D'INCAU, M., SCARDI, P. (2007). Revision and extension of the standard laboratory technique for X-ray diffraction measurement of residual stress gradients. In: Journal of Applied Crystallography, Vol. 40, pp. 675 - 683. Go to original source...
    10. THEINER, W. A. (1998). Physical basis of micromagnetic methods and sensor systems and their application areas. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Barkhausen noise and Micromagnetic Testing, pp. 197 - 218. Hannover.
    11. THEINER, W. (1986). Stress measurements on components with nondestructive ferromagnetic methods. In: Residual Stresses in Science and Technology, Vol. 1, pp. 167 - 174.
    12. TIITTO, S., SAYNAJAKANGAS, S. (1975). Spectral damping in Barkhausen noise. In: IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 1666 - 1672. Go to original source...
    13. SAGLAM, H., UNSACAR, F., YALDIZ, S. (2006). Investigation of the effect of rake angle and approaching angle on main cutting force and tool tip temperature. In: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 132 - 141. Go to original source...
    14. VASILKO, K. (2009). Teória a prax trieskového obrábania, pp. 35 - 82. COFIN, Prešov.
    15. VASILKO, K. (2014). New experimental dependence of machining. In: Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 111 - 116. Go to original source...
    16. GUPTA, M., KUMAR, S. (2015). Investigation of surface roughness and MRR for turning of UD-GFRP using PCA and Taguchi method. In: Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 70 - 81. Go to original source...

    Return to the content