Manufacturing Technology 2020, 20(5):591-602
Predictive modelling and optimisation of surface roughness in turning of AISI 1050 steel using polynomial regression
- 1 Université M’hamed Bougara, Boumerdes, Faculty of Hydrocarbons and Chemistry, Oil Equipments Reliability & Materials Research Laboratory (LFEPM). Boumerdes 35000, Algeria
- 2 University of Jijel, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Algeria
Surface integrity plays an important role in the functional performance of mechanical components and is one of the most particular consumer requirements in machined parts. Customarily, surface roughness is considered to be the principal parameter in evaluating surface integrity and surface quality on machined parts and has a significant effect on service reliability and component durability. It is dependent on a large number of machining parameters, such as tool geometry (i.e. nose radius, edge geometry, rake angle, etc.) and cutting conditions (feed, cutting speed, depth of cut). The effects of these parameters have not however been adequately quantified. So in order to identify the optimum combination of cutting conditions corresponding to better roughness, accurate predictive models for surface roughness must, as a first step, be constructed. An investigation in this regard has been conducted to address the surface integrity optimisation and prediction issue by applying the polynomial regression method for a variety of experiments and cutting conditions. A higher correlation coefficient (R?) was obtained with a cubic regression model, which had a value of 0.9480 for Ra. The use of the response surface optimisation and composite desirability show that the optimal set of machining parameters values are (250m/min, 0.2398 mm/rev and 2.3383 mm) for cutting speed, feed and depth of cut, respectively. The optimised surface roughness parameter and productivity are Ra =2.7567 ?m and Q = 95.341*103 mm3/ min, respectively. Results show that the models developed can accurately predict the roughness on the basis of measured cutting conditions as input parameters, and can also be used to control the surface roughness by making a comparison between measured and estimated values. Furthermore, operators can benefit from the proposed models if the aim is the reverse determination of the cutting conditions corresponding to the requested roughness profile.
Keywords: Surface integrity, roughness; cutting conditions, polynomial regression, ANOVA, optimisation
Grants and funding:
The General Directorate of Scientific Research and Technological Development (DGRSDT, Algeria) in acknowledgement of their support to the present work (PRFU N° A11N01UN35012018004).
Received: May 1, 2020; Revised: October 20, 2020; Accepted: October 26, 2020; Prepublished online: November 23, 2020; Published: December 14, 2020 Show citation
References
- BOOTHROYD, G.W.A. (2006). Knight, Fundamentals of Machining and Machine Tools, third ed., CRC press, Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 1-57447-659-2.
- WHITEHOUSE, D.J. (1994). Handbook of Surface Metrology, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, UK. ISBN 0-7503-0039-6.
- FANG, X. D.; SAFI-JAHANSHAHI, H. (1997). A new algorithm for developing a reference-based model for predicting surface roughness in finish machining of steels, International Journal of Production Research, 1997, Vol. 35: Nr.1, pp. 179-199.
Go to original source...
- CHOUDHURY, I.A., EL-BARADIE, M.A. (1997). Surface roughness in the turning of high-strength steel by factorial design of experiments. Journal of Material Processing Technology, 1997, Vol. 67, pp. 55- 61.
Go to original source...
- DURMUS K. ( 20 0 9 ). Prediction and control of surface roughness in CNC lathe using artificial neural network, journal of materials processing technology, 2 00 9, pp. 3125-3137.
- ESCALONA, P.M., CASSIER, Z. (1998). Influence of critical cutting speed on the surface finish of turned steel, Wear, 1998, Vol. 218, pp. 103-109.
Go to original source...
- DAVIM, J.P. (2001). A note on the determination of optimal cutting conditions for surface finish obtained in turning using design of experiments, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2001, Vol. 116, pp. 305-308.
Go to original source...
- MAKADIA A.J., NANAVATI, J.I. (2013). Optimisation of machining parameters for turning operations based on response surface methodology, Measurement, 2013, Vol. 46, pp. 1521-1529.
Go to original source...
- OZEL, T., KARPAT, Y. (2005). Predictive modeling of surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning using regression and neural networks, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2005, Vol. 45, pp. 467-479.
Go to original source...
- HAMDI, A., MOHAMED A.Y., KAMEL C., TAREK M., JEAN-FRANÇOIS R. (2012). Analysis of surface roughness and cutting force components in hard turning with CBN tool: Prediction model and cutting conditions optimization, Measurement, 2012, Vol. 45, pp. 344-353.
Go to original source...
- KOPAC, J., BAHOR, M., SOKOVIC, M. (2002). Optimal machining parameters for achieving the desired surface roughness in fine turning of cold preformed steel workpieces, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 2002, Vol. 42, pp. 707-716.
Go to original source...
- ILHAN, A., HARUN, A. (2011). Determining the effect of cutting parameters on surface roughness in hard turning using the Taguchi method, Measurement, 2011, Vol. 44, pp.1697-1704
- FUAT, K., (2017). Taguchi optimization of surface roughness and flank wear during the turning of DIN 1.2344 tool steel", Material Testing, 2017, Vol. 59, Nr.10, pp. 903-908.
Go to original source...
- ABDUL-LATEEF, A., HAMID, A., CHEE, P.L., WISAM A.Y. (2018). Force and temperature modelling of bone milling using artificial neural networks, Measurement, 2018, Vol. 116, pp. 25-37.
Go to original source...
- ONDŘEJ BÍLEK, O., PATA, V., KUBI©OVÁ, M.,,ŘEZNÍČEK, M. (2018). Mathematical methods of surface roughness evaluation of areas with a distinctive inclination, Manufacturing Technology, Vol.18, No. 3, pp. 363-368.
Go to original source...
- Mohamed, T., Hamid, H., Salah, A., Salim, B.(2017). Effect of Roller Burnishing Parameters on Roughness Surface and Hardness of Unalloyed S 355 J0 Steel by Using Response Surface Methodology. Manufacturing
Go to original source...
- Technology, vol. 17, pp. 602-610.
- [17] BLOUL, B., BOURDIM, A., AOUR, B., HARHOUT, R. (2017). Measurement default diagnostics of a roughness meter with TS100 head using a rectified specimen and solved by fuzzy logic estimator, Int J Adv
Go to original source...
- Manuf Technol, 2017, Vol. 92, pp. 673-684.
Go to original source...
- [18] BOJANOV, B., XU, Y. (2003). On polynomial interpolation of two variables, J. Approximation Theory, 2003, Vol. 120, pp. 267-282.
Go to original source...
- [19] DUREJA, J.S., GUPTA, V.K., DOGRA, M. (2009). Design optimization of cutting conditions and analysis of their effect on tool wear and surface roughness during hard turning of AISI-H11 steel with a coated mixed ceramic tool, J. Eng. Manuf., 2009, Vol. 223, pp. 1441-1453.
Go to original source...
- [20] BENLAHMIDI, S., AOUICI, H., BOUTAGHANE, F., KHELLAF, A., FNIDES, B., YALLESE M.A. (2017). Design optimization of cutting parameters when turning hardened AISI H11 steel (50 HRC) with CBN7020 tools, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2017, Vol. 89, pp. 803-820.
Go to original source...
- [21] PHILIP, S. D., CHANDRAMOHAN, P., MOHANRAJ, M. (2014). Optimization of surface roughness, cutting force and tool wear of nitrogen alloyed duplex stainless steel in a dry turning process using Taguchi method, Measurement, 2014, Vol. 49, Nr. 1, pp. 49205-215.
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.