Manufacturing Technology 2015, 15(1):70-74 | DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2015/a/1213-2489/MT/15/1/70

Influence of Drying Process of Liquid Contaminants on Adhesive Bond Strength

Miroslav Müller1, Petr Henc1, Anna Rudawska2
1 Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague. Czech Republic
2 Politechnika Lubelska, Department of Production Engineering, Lublin, Poland

Regarding effects of environment factors on adhesive bonds belongs among key requirements influencing the adhesive bond strength. The aim of experiments was to set an influence of liquid contaminants on changes of the adhesive bond strength and to set whether a degradation process is an irreversible change that means whether degradation adhesives will restore their strength characteristics depending on the time. The adhesive bonds were placed into three liquid contaminants for the time 1, 2 and 3 months. The testing process was performed after removing specimens from the liquid contaminant (marked as 0), then after 24, 72 and 163 h. A considerable fall of the adhesive bond strength has already occurred in the first phase of the testing that means after 1 month of the contamination. The rate of the adhesive bond strength fall caused by the degradation process is in the interval 10 till 92 %. This undesirable process can be subsequently suppressed by a drying process of the liquid contaminant. The experiment results certified in most cases a positive influence of the drying process of the liquid contaminants on the adhesive bond strength.

Keywords: Adhesive bond, degradation, exposing, two-component epoxy, testing

Published: February 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Müller M, Henc P, Rudawska A. Influence of Drying Process of Liquid Contaminants on Adhesive Bond Strength. Manufacturing Technology. 2015;15(1):70-74. doi: 10.21062/ujep/x.2015/a/1213-2489/MT/15/1/70.
Download citation

References

  1. MÜLLER, M. (2013). Research of Liquid Contaminants Influence on Adhesive Bond Strength Applied in Agricultural Machine Construction. In: Agronomy Research, Vol. 11, pp. 147-154.
  2. MÜLLER, M., HERÁK, D. (2013). Application possibilities of adhesive bonds - Europe, Indonesia. In: Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, Vol. 44, pp. 167-171. Go to original source...
  3. MESSLER, R. W. (2004). Joining of materials and structures from pragmatic process to enabling technology. Burlington: Elsevier, 815 pp. Go to original source...
  4. MÜLLER, M., VALÁ©EK, P. (2012). Degradation medium of agrokomplex - adhesive bonded joints interaction. In: Research in Agricultural Engineering, Vol. 58, pp. 83-91. Go to original source...
  5. CIDLINA, J., MÜLLER, M., VALÁ©EK, P. (2014). Evaluation of Adhesive Bond Strength Depending on Degradation Type and Time. In: Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 8-12. Go to original source...
  6. MÜLLER, M., RU®BARSKİ, J., VALÁ©EK, P. (2014). Degradation process in area of connecting metal sheets by adhesive bonding technology in agrocomplex. In: Applied Mechanics and Materials. Vol. 616, pp. 52-60. Go to original source...
  7. CROCOMBE, A., D., HUA, Y., X., LOH, W., K., WAHAB, M., A., ASHCROFT, I., A. (2006). Predicting the residual strength for environmentally degraded adhesive lap joints. In: International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, Vol. 26, pp. 325-336. Go to original source...
  8. LOH, W., K., CROCOMBE, M., M., ABDEL WAHAB, I., A. (2003). Modelling interfacial degradation using interfacial rupture elements. In: Journal of adhesion, Vol. 79, pp.1135-1160. Go to original source...
  9. RUDAWSKA, A. (2014). Selected aspects of the effect of mechanical treatment on surface roughness and adhesive joint strength of steel sheets. In: International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, Vol. 50, pp. 235-243. Go to original source...
  10. COMYN, J. (1990). Surface treatment and analysis for adhesive bonding. In: International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, Vol. 10, p. 161-165. Go to original source...
  11. MÜLLER, M. (2011). Influence of Surface Integrity on Bonding Process. In: Research in Agricultural Engineering, Vol. 57, pp. 153-162. Go to original source...
  12. NOVÁK, M. (2012). Surfaces with high precision of roughness after grinding. In: Manufacturing technology, Vol. 12, pp. 66-70. Go to original source...
  13. NOVÁK, M. (2011). Surface quality of hardened steels after grinding. In: Manufacturing technology, Vol. 11, pp.55-59. Go to original source...
  14. HOLE©OVSKİ, F., NÁPRSTKOVÁ, N., NOVÁK, M. (2012). GICS for grinding process optimization. In: Manufacturing technology, Vol. 12, pp. 22-26. Go to original source...
  15. KROLCZYK, G., LEGUTKO, S. (2013). The machinability of duplex stainless steel-solutions in practice. In: Manufacturing technology, Vol. 13, pp. 473-478. Go to original source...
  16. HOLE©OVSKİ, F., NOVÁK, M., LATTER, M., VYSLOUZIL, T. (2013). Machining and its influence to surface quality of machine parts. In: Key Engineering Materials. Vol. 581. pp. 354-359. Go to original source...
  17. JÓZWIK, J., KURIC, I., SÁGA, M., LONKOWIC, P. (2014). Diagnostics of CNC machine tools in manufacturing process with laser interferometer technology. In: Manufacturing technology, Vol. 14, pp. 23-30. Go to original source...
  18. NOVÁK, M. (2013). New ways at the fine grinding. In: Key Engineering Materials. Vol. 581. pp. 255-260. Go to original source...
  19. BALKOVA, R., HOLCNEROVA, S., CECH, V. (2002). Testing of adhesives for bonding of polymer composites. In: International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, Vol. 22, pp. 291-295. Go to original source...
  20. MÜLLER, M. (2013). Research of renovation possibility of machine tools damage by adhesive bonding technology. In: Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 13, pp. 504-509. Go to original source...
  21. KINLOCH, A., J., OSIYEMI, S., O. (1993). Predicting the fatigue life of adhesively-bonded joints. In: Journal of adhesion. Vol. 43, pp. 79-90. Go to original source...