Manufacturing Technology 2015, 15(4):710-714 | DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2015/a/1213-2489/MT/15/4/710

Influence of Cutting Fluid on Abrasive - Free Ultrasonic Finishing of Aluminium Alloy

Jaroslava Svobodová1, Pavel Kraus1, Miroslav Müller2, Anatolii Lebedev3, Alexander Yurov3, Pavel Lebedev3
1 Faculty of production technology and management, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem. Czech Republic
2 Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague. Czech Republic
3 Faculty of Agricultural Mechanization, Stavropol State Agrarian Mechanization, Russia

The aim of the research was to compare a classical (turning) machining and an abrasive-free ultrasonic machining (bufo) at aluminium alloy. An ultrasonic set I - 4 consisted of the ultrasonic generator, power output 630 W and working frequency 22 kHz ± 10%, was used for the research. Three different cutting fluids containing nanoparticles were compared at the abrasive-free ultrasonic finishing. A rise of a hardness HV0.05 and HBW2.5/62.5 compared to the classical machining occurred at the application of the abrasive-free ultrasonic machining technology at the aluminium alloy by various cutting fluids containing nanoparticles. It is obvious from the results that a considerable fall of the surface roughness parameters Ra and Rz occurred at the application using the abrasive-free ultrasonic finishing.

Keywords: Hardness HV0.05, Hardness HBW2.5/62.5, Nano-powder, Surface Roughness, Ultrasound

Published: September 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Svobodová J, Kraus P, Müller M, Lebedev A, Yurov A, Lebedev P. Influence of Cutting Fluid on Abrasive - Free Ultrasonic Finishing of Aluminium Alloy. Manufacturing Technology. 2015;15(4):710-714. doi: 10.21062/ujep/x.2015/a/1213-2489/MT/15/4/710.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open article abstract

    References

    1. NOVÁK, M. (2012). Surfaces with high precision of roughness after grinding. In: Manufacturing technology. Vol. 12, pp. 66-70. Go to original source...
    2. NOVÁK, M. (2011). Surface quality of hardened steels after grinding. In: Manufacturing technology. Vol. 11, pp.55-59. Go to original source...
    3. HOLE©OVSKÝ, F., NÁPRSTKOVÁ, N., NOVÁK, M. (2012). GICS for grinding process optimization. In: Manufacturing technology. Vol. 12, pp. 22-26. Go to original source...
    4. PA, P., S. (2009). Super finishing with ultrasonic and magnetic assistance in electrochemical micro-machining. In: Electrochimica Acta. Vol. 54, pp. 6022-6027. Go to original source...
    5. MÜLLER, M., LEBEDEV, A., SVOBODOVÁ, J., NÁPRSTKOVÁ, N., LEBEDEV, P. (2014). Abrasive-free ultrasonic finishing of metals. In: Manufacturing Technology. Vol. 14, pp. 366-370. Go to original source...
    6. ČIERNA, H. «AVODOVÁ, M. (2013). Using the design of experiment method to evaluate quality of cuts after cutting aluminum alloy by AWJ. In: Manufacturing technology. Vol. 13, pp. 303-307. Go to original source...
    7. HRICOVA, J. (2014). Environmentally conscious manufacturing: the effect of metalworking fluid in high speed machining. In: Key engineering materials. Vol. 581, pp. 89-94. Go to original source...
    8. «AVODOVA, M. (2013). The surface quality of materials after cutting by abrasive water jet evaluated by selected methods. In: Manufacturing technology. Vol. 13, pp. 236-241. Go to original source...
    9. KROLCZYK, G., LEGUTKO, S. (2013). The machinability of duplex stainless steel-solutions in practice. In: Manufacturing technology. Vol. 13, pp. 473-478. Go to original source...
    10. HOLE©OVSKÝ, F., NOVÁK, M., LATTER, M., VYSLOUZIL, T. (2013). Machining and its influence to surface quality of machine parts. In: Key Engineering Materials. Vol. 581. pp. 354-359. Go to original source...
    11. JÓZWIK, J., KURIC, I., SÁGA, M., LONKOWIC, P. (2014). Diagnostics of CNC machine tools in manufacturing process with laser interferometer technology. In: Manufacturing technology. Vol. 14, pp. 23-30. Go to original source...
    12. NOVÁK, M. (2013). New ways at the fine grinding. In: Key Engineering Materials. Vol. 581. pp. 255-260. Go to original source...
    13. VENKATESH, G., APURBBA KUMAR SHARMA, KUMAR, P. (2015). On ultrasonic assisted abrasive flow finishing of bevel gears. In: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. Vol. 89, pp. 29-38. Go to original source...
    14. SHAIKH, J.H., JAIN, N.K., VENKATESH, V.C. (2013). Precision finishing of Bevel Gears by Electrochemical Honing. In: Materials and Manufacturing Processes. Vol. 28, pp. 1117-1123. Go to original source...
    15. KOMARAIAH, M., REDDY, N. (1993). A study on the influence of workpiece properties in ultrasonic machining, In: International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture. Vol. 33, pp. 495-505. Go to original source...
    16. CURODEAU, A., GUAY, J., RODRIGUE, D., BRAULT, L., GAGNE, D., BEAUDIOIN, L., P. (2008). Ultrasonic abrasive μ-machining with thermoplastic tooling. In: International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture. Vol. 48, pp. 1553-1561. Go to original source...
    17. LEGUTKO, S., KROLCZYK, G., KROLCZYK, G. (2014). Quality evaluation of surface layer in highly accurate manufacturing. In: Manufacturing technology. Vol. 14, pp. 50-56. Go to original source...

    Return to the content