Manufacturing Technology 2018, 18(2):190-193 | DOI: 10.21062/ujep/76.2018/a/1213-2489/MT/18/2/190

Comparison of Analytical Stress Analysis and Numerical Calculation of Mobile Work Machine Part

Mária Blatnická1, Miroslav Blatnický2, Ján Dižo2, Milan Sága1
1 Department of Applied Mechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina. Univerzitná 1, 010 26 Žilina. Slovakia
2 Department of Transport and Handling Machines, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina. Univerzitná 1, 010 26 Žilina. Slovakia

The aim of the article is to verify dimensions of the hydraulic arm column (the necessary cross-sectional area) by analytical dimensional calculation and thus to design a lifting rotary arm which will be located on the pick-up car body (Figure 1). After the analysis of dimensions, the next step is creation of the structure in FEM program and then a numerical analysis will be carried out for verification of stress in the structure already with the values that are not available for the preliminary design (e.g. the structure weight). The next step in the solution will be to import the proposed and by strength calculations checked geometry into the multibody system program, where the dynamic response of the structure will be monitored, depending on the size of the load and the movement possibilities of this mechanism.

Keywords: Numerical analysis, Hydraulic arm, Stress, Work machine

Published: April 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Blatnická M, Blatnický M, Dižo J, Sága M. Comparison of Analytical Stress Analysis and Numerical Calculation of Mobile Work Machine Part. Manufacturing Technology. 2018;18(2):190-193. doi: 10.21062/ujep/76.2018/a/1213-2489/MT/18/2/190.
Download citation

References

  1. BAJLA, J., BRONCEK, J., ANTALA, J., SEKERESOVA, D. (2014). Mechanical Engineering Tables. (In Slovak). Selection Standard. Slovak Office Standards, Metrology and Testing. ISBN 978-80-8130-039-4.
  2. KOPAS, P., JAKUBOVICOVA, L., VASKO, M., HANDRIK, M. (2016). Fatigue resistance of reinforcing steel bars. Procedia Engineering, vol. 136, 2016, pp. 193-197. Go to original source...
  3. HANDRIK, M., VASKO, M., KOPAS, P., MOZER, V. (2016). The linear and nonlinear stability loss of strucutres due to thermal load. Procedia Engineering, vol. 136, 2016, pp. 359-364. Go to original source...
  4. SAPIETOVA, A., BUKOVAN, J., SAPIETA, M., JAKUBOVICOVA, L. (2017). Analysis and Implementation of Input Load Effects on an Air Compressor Piston in Msc. Adams. Procedia Engineering, vol. 177, 2017, pp. 554-561. Go to original source...
  5. DEKYS, V. (2017). Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis. Procedia Engineering, vol. 177, pp.502-509. Go to original source...
  6. ZMINDAK, M., NOVAK, P., DEKYS, V. (2017). Finite element analysis of the delaminated composite plates reinforced by unidirectional fibres. Manufacturing Technology, vol. 17 (2), 2017, pp. 275-280. Go to original source...
  7. BATHE, K. J. (1996). Finite element procedures. Prenice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey. ISBN 0-13-301458-4.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.