Manufacturing Technology 2018, 18(4):552-558 | DOI: 10.21062/ujep/136.2018/a/1213-2489/MT/18/4/552
Optimizing Fabrication Outcome in Low-Cost FDM Machines. Part 2 - Tests
- Department of Industrial Engineering of Florence, University of Florence - Via di Santa Marta 3, 50139, Firenze, Italy
Several models of FDM machines, characterized by different architecture and hardware components, have flooded the market in the last 5 years. As a result, given the high sensitivity of FDM to the specific machine characteristics, the search for optimal printing parameters is a renown problem. This two-parts paper proposes an easy-to-follow and low-cost procedure for the characterization of any given FDM machine. The method allows the evaluation of the effects of a wide selection of FDM process parameters on the quality of 3D printed parts. The first part focused on the definition of a series of metrics to be measured on a series of test prints to evaluate the quality of the produced parts. The evaluation of seven quality parameters on a single print is made possible thanks to: i) a specifically designed specimen that is made available to the user and ii) a rigorous and repeatable measurement procedure, which are both discussed in the first part of the paper. This second part presents the characterization procedure, the statistical tools used in the experimentation (DOE tools and principles are adopted throughout the experimentation) and provides guidelines to be used for the characterization of any FDM machine. The whole procedure is tested on a desktop FDM machine to demonstrate obtainable results, proving the efficacy of the proposed methodology and highlight strengths and drawbacks of the approach.
Keywords: Additive Manufacturing (AM), Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), Process Optimization, Design of Experiments (DOE), 3D Printing
Published: September 1, 2018 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Ultimaker Cura 3D Printing Software. [Online]. Available: https://ultimaker.com/en/products/ultimaker-cura-software. [Accessed: 01-Mar-2018].
- Slic3r - G-code generator for 3D printers. [Online]. Available: http://slic3r.org/. [Accessed: 28-Apr-2017].
- RAYEGANI, F., ONWUBOLU, G.C. (2014). Fused deposition modelling (fdm) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (gmdh) and differential evolution (de). In: International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 73, No. 1-4, pp. 509-519.
Go to original source...
- MOHAMED, O.A., MASOOD, S.H., BHOWMIK, J.L. (2015). Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects, In: Advances in Manufacturing, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 42-53.
Go to original source...
- WANG, T.-M., XI, J.-T., JIN, Y. (2007). A model research for prototype warp deformation in the FDM process, In: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 33, No. 11-12, pp. 1087-1096.
Go to original source...
- Minitab. [Online]. Available: http://www.minitab.com/en-us/. [Accessed: 23-Jan-2018].
- GIMAX 3D | Stampante 3d | the future you can touch! - Italy. [Online]. Available: http://www.gimax3d.com/standard2_gimax3d.html. [Accessed: 31-Aug-2017].
- MONTGOMERY, D.C. (2001). Design and analysis of experiments. John Wiley.
- FDM Test Model - Evaluation of multiple effects by frank_2288 - Thingiverse. [Online]. Available: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2762593. [Accessed: 22-Jan-2018].
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.