Manufacturing Technology 2021, 21(3):373-380 | DOI: 10.21062/mft.2021.038

Optimization of Material Removal Rate and Surface Roughness of AISI 316L under Dry Turning Process using Genetic Algorithm

Sigit Yoewono Martowibowo ORCID...1, Bivynka Kemala Damanik ORCID...2
1 Faculty of Manufacturing Technology, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani, Jalan Terusan Jenderal Gatot Subroto, Bandung 40284, Indonesia
2 Alliance Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester, Booth Street West, Manchester, M15 6PB, United Kingdom

The turning process is one of the most common machining operations in various manufacturing industries. It is conducted by eroding the rotating workpiece using a tool that moves in a linear motion. This study examined the genetic algorithm (GA) as the optimization method for the dry turning process of AISI 316L. GA is a meta-heuristic method that imitates the principle of natural selection, in which the most suitable individuals are selected for reproduction to produce the next generation of offspring. The optimization process was started by executing the selected experimental design based on the process parameters and their levels. The tool nose radius, cutting speed, feed rate, and depth of cut were selected as the process parameters in this study. The outcome of this step was a fitness function that explained the relationship between the process parameters and the material removal rate (MRR) or the surface roughness (SR). GA used the fitness function to produce the optimal process parameters with the highest MRR and the lowest SR in a separate optimization process. The optimization methodology developed in this study can be utilized to predict the optimum value of the MRR and SR for the dry turning process and with less than a 7% deviation from the actual value.

Keywords: Dry Turning Process, Genetic Algorithm, Material Removal Rate, Optimization, Surface Roughness

Received: July 21, 2020; Revised: April 22, 2021; Accepted: April 23, 2021; Prepublished online: April 26, 2021; Published: June 7, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Martowibowo SY, Kemala Damanik B. Optimization of Material Removal Rate and Surface Roughness of AISI 316L under Dry Turning Process using Genetic Algorithm. Manufacturing Technology. 2021;21(3):373-380. doi: 10.21062/mft.2021.038.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. AHILAN, C., KUMANAN, S.; SIVAKUMARAN, N., EDWIN RAJA DHAS, J. (2013). Modeling and prediction of machining quality in CNC turning process using intelligent hybrid decision making tools. In: Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 1543-1551. DOI:10.1016/j.asoc.2012.03.071 Go to original source...
    2. PALANIKUMAR, K., KARUNAMOORTHY, L., KARTHIKEYAN, R. (2005). Assessment of factors influencing surface roughness on the machining of glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites. In: Materials and Design, Vol. 27, No. 10, pp. 862-871. DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2005.03.011 Go to original source...
    3. KROLCZYK, G.M., NIESLONY, P., MARUDA, R.W., WOJCIECHOWSKI, S. (2017). Dry cutting effect in turning of a duplex stainless steel as a key factor in clean production. In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 142, No. 4, pp. 3343-3354. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.136 Go to original source...
    4. CHEN, J., WANG, Y., ZHANG, Y., YANG, S., ZHANG, X. (2020). Investigation on tool wear mechanism during dry cutting 304 stainless steel. In: Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 36-44. DOI: 10.21062/mft.2020.011 Go to original source...
    5. DAVIS, J.R. (Ed.) (2003). Handbook of Materials for Medical Devices, ASM International, Ohio.
    6. DISEGI, J.A., ESCHBACH, L. (2000). Stainless steel in bone surgery. In: Injury, Vol. 31, Suppl. 4, pp. D2-D6. DOI:10.1016/S0020-1383(00)80015-7 Go to original source...
    7. ASILTÛRK, I., AKKUS, H. (2011). Determining the effect of cutting parameters on surface roughness in hard turning using the Taguchi method. In: Measurement, Vol. 44, No. 9, pp. 1697-1704. DOI:10.1016/j.measurement.2011.07.003 Go to original source...
    8. CHONG, E.K.P., ¯AK, S.H. (2001). An Introduction to Optimization, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
    9. HARHOUT, R., GACEP, M., HADDAD, S., AGUIB, S., BLOUL, B., GUEBLI, A. (2020). Predictive modelling and optimisation of surface roughness in turning of AISI 1050 steel using polynomial regression. In: Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 591-602. DOI: 10.21062/mft.2020.094 Go to original source...
    10. MARTOWIBOWO, S.Y., KASWADI, A. (2017). Optimization and simulation of plastic injection process using genetic algorithm and moldflow. In: Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 398-406. DOI:10.1007/s10033-017-0081-9 Go to original source...
    11. SENTHILKUMAR, B., KANNAN, T., MADESH, R. (2017). Optimization of flux-cored arc welding process parameters by using genetic algorithm. In: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 93, No. 1-4, pp. 35-41. DOI:10.1007/s00170-015-7636-7 Go to original source...
    12. KRIMPENIS, A.A., FOUNTAS, N.A., NTALIANIS, I., VAXEVANIDIS, N.M. (2014). CNC micromilling properties and optimization using genetic algorithms. In: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 70, No. 1-4, pp. 157-171. DOI:10.1007/s00170-013-5248-7 Go to original source...
    13. Mitsubishi Materials Technical Data. Retrieved May 17, 2019, from http://www.teraskonttori.fi/easydata/customers/teraskonttori/files/lastuavat/Mitsu_14_TECHNICAL_DATA.pdf.
    14. MONTGOMERY, D.C. (2008). Design and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
    15. HOLLAND, J.H. (1975). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbour, MI.
    16. GOLDBERG, D.E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts.
    17. MICHALEWICZ, Z. (1992). Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH, New York. Go to original source...
    18. HAZRA, A. (2017). Using the confidence interval confidently. In: Journal of Thoracic Disease, Vol. 9, No. 10, pp. 4125-4130. DOI:10.21037/jtd.2017.09.14 Go to original source...
    19. MISHRA, A., SHUKLA, A. (2017). Analysis of the effect of elite count on the behavior of genetic algorithms: A perspective. In: Proceeding of the 2017 IEEE 7th International Advance Computing Conference (IACC), January 5-7, pp. 835-840, Hyderabad. Go to original source...
    20. IMADE, S., MORI, R., UCHIO, Y., FURUYA, S. (2009). Effect of implant surface roughness on bone fixation: the differences between bone and metal pegs. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Science, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 652-657. DOI:10.1007/s00776-009-1369-0 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content